From b0cb13f607bc5282adf29e1ae6bcd4fd072fb7bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: dembim Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 18:54:29 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] update some idiolectical stuff --- dembim.foo/site/index.dj | 19 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/dembim.foo/site/index.dj b/dembim.foo/site/index.dj index a0792ab..b8458bb 100644 --- a/dembim.foo/site/index.dj +++ b/dembim.foo/site/index.dj @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ # Ké Hao po Jí -This is as much for my own recollection as for the information of anyone else. +This is as much for my own recollection as for the information of anyone else.\ +I basically use [Eatoaq](https://robin.town/blog/sa-ea-buriaq), with the folowing notes. - I write with [prefix reform](https://toaq.me/Prefix_reform), but use official pronunciation. @@ -8,25 +9,21 @@ This is as much for my own recollection as for the information of anyone else. - I subscribe to the [focus-topic-cleft merger](https://toaq.me/Focus%E2%80%93cleft_merger), but don't use it much. -- I subscribe to the [double focus extension](https://toaq.me/Double_focus), and _do_ use _it_ much. - -- I subscribe to the [simple focus reform](https://toaq.me/Simple_Focus). +- I subscribe to [simple focus](https://toaq.me/Simple_Focus) and the [double focus extension](https://toaq.me/Double_focus), and _do_ use _them_ much. - I consider VPs to be [Weird](https://toaq.me/Weird_VPs), with the pleasant consequence that « Lıecho noqgaı keo bu pua shıqgaı Jéımı báq cıenueq. » means what it looks like. -- I use (roughly) one syntax for modals and adjuncts, which is to say that I sometimes front adjuncts and sometimes interpose modals. For example: « **Kûı**, vá maı jı́ nháo, nä shao gaq jı́ nháo da. Jıa pua gaq nháo jí **dâı**, vä shao nháo, lá he maıgeq já jı́ da. » Shúq roadue ní da. +- I use conjunctions in hiatus tone as forethought operators, i.e. in Polish notation. « rû nhashı́ nhagú rá nhasáq » is `AND(nhashí, OR(nhagú, nhasáq))`. + +- I use (roughly) one syntax for modals and adjuncts, which is to say that I sometimes front adjuncts and sometimes interpose modals. For example: « **Kuı** vâ maı jı́ nháo, nâ shao gaq jı́ nháo da. Jıa pua gaq nháo jí **dâı**, vâ shao nháo, lá he maıgeq já jı́ da. » Shúq roadue ní da. - I consider « bo- » to be a true-passivizer and so use « tı- » for "inverse voice". -- He kulèo choq jı́ mı́mo "strict polarity" teo, kéo bumuolìm jı́ mó bu- teo da. - -- I trust vé moı [Kı́a](https://robin.town) hóa râq "degree words"; Kía finds that degree words need distinct grammar. - - I use « g » to terminate reduced complementizer phrases, especially for the purpose of combining OI with adjectives. -- I also use « ca- » to echo-resumptively terminate subclauses. +- I also sometimes use « ca- » to echo-resumptively terminate subclauses when I forget to extrapose them. -- I never underfill full complementizer phrases, but I consider unfilled slots in determiner phrases to be filled according to the head determiner. In particular, indefinite DPs are existentially quantified in unfilled slots, while definite determiners have « ráı » in unfilled slots. For example, « tú fu » = « tú fu sâ raı » and « hú aıse » = « hú aıse lô raı ». The only deviation from this is in « báq » phrases, where unfilled slots get « báq raı ». +- I never underfill full complementizer phrases, but I consider unfilled slots in determiner phrases to be filled according to the head determiner. In particular, indefinite DPs are existentially quantified in unfilled slots, while definite determiners have « ráı » in unfilled slots. For example, « tú fu » = « tú fu sa raı » and « hú aıse » = « hú aıse lo raı ». The only deviation from this is in « báq » phrases, where unfilled slots get « báq raı ». - I frequently use overt adjunct heads, especially « [ı̂uq](https://toadua.uakci.space/##iGVz0emo4) », « [nûao](https://toadua.uakci.space/##cqtdPusTB) », « [ı̂aı](https://toadua.uakci.space/##ZxxlL0NdG) », « [ôq](https://toadua.uakci.space/##70rCWf6zQ#70rCWf6zQ) », and « [lû](https://toadua.uakci.space/##_odzwFLN5) ».