acl.cool/site/writings/saıram.dj

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 # Sá Chateikao Haqbai bâq Sairam
 
-_Hê, vä choq há nı́, nä haqbaı há sáq cenhe saıram da._
-
 ## Túq Baıpaq bâq Saıram
 
+_Hê, vä choq há nı́, nä haqbaı há sáq cenhe saıram da._
+
 - **féfue garam** nueq begùobe gam
 - túq toese **gû** karatoq
 - túq toese **sâq** pıma nıq

dembim.foo/site/index.dj

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 # Ké Hao po Jí
 
-This is as much for my own recollection as for the information of anyone else.\ 
-I basically use [Eatoaq](https://robin.town/blog/sa-ea-buriaq), with the folowing notes.
+This is as much for my own recollection as for the information of anyone else.
 
 - I write with [prefix reform](https://toaq.me/Prefix_reform), but use official pronunciation.
 
@@ -9,21 +8,25 @@ I basically use [Eatoaq](https://robin.town/blog/sa-ea-buriaq), with the folowin
 
 - I subscribe to the [focus-topic-cleft merger](https://toaq.me/Focus%E2%80%93cleft_merger), but don't use it much.
 
-- I subscribe to [simple focus](https://toaq.me/Simple_Focus) and the [double focus extension](https://toaq.me/Double_focus), and _do_ use _them_ much.
+- I subscribe to the [double focus extension](https://toaq.me/Double_focus), and _do_ use _it_ much.
+
+- I subscribe to the [simple focus reform](https://toaq.me/Simple_Focus).
 
 - I consider VPs to be [Weird](https://toaq.me/Weird_VPs), with the pleasant consequence that « Lıecho noqgaı keo bu pua shıqgaı Jéımı báq cıenueq. » means what it looks like.
 
-- I use conjunctions in hiatus tone as forethought operators, i.e. in Polish notation. « rû nhashı́ nhagú rá nhasáq » is `AND(nhashí, OR(nhagú, nhasáq))`.
-
-- I use (roughly) one syntax for modals and adjuncts, which is to say that I sometimes front adjuncts and sometimes interpose modals. For example: « **Kuı** vâ maı jı́ nháo, nâ shao gaq jı́ nháo da. Jıa pua gaq nháo jí **dâı**, vâ shao nháo, lá he maıgeq já jı́ da. » Shúq roadue ní da.
+- I use (roughly) one syntax for modals and adjuncts, which is to say that I sometimes front adjuncts and sometimes interpose modals. For example: « **Kûı**, vá maı jı́ nháo, nä shao gaq jı́ nháo da. Jıa pua gaq nháo jí **dâı**, vä shao nháo, lá he maıgeq já jı́ da. » Shúq roadue ní da.
 
 - I consider « bo- » to be a true-passivizer and so use « tı- » for "inverse voice".
 
+- He kulèo choq jı́ mı́mo "strict polarity" teo, kéo bumuolìm jı́ mó bu- teo da.
+
+- I trust vé moı [Kı́a](https://robin.town) hóa râq "degree words"; Kía finds that degree words need distinct grammar.
+
 - I use « g » to terminate reduced complementizer phrases, especially for the purpose of combining OI with adjectives.
 
-- I also sometimes use « ca- » to echo-resumptively terminate subclauses when I forget to extrapose them.
+- I also use « ca- » to echo-resumptively terminate subclauses.
 
-- I never underfill full complementizer phrases, but I consider unfilled slots in determiner phrases to be filled according to the head determiner. In particular, indefinite DPs are existentially quantified in unfilled slots, while definite determiners have « ráı » in unfilled slots. For example, « tú fu » = « tú fu sa raı » and « hú aıse » = « hú aıse lo raı ». The only deviation from this is in « báq » phrases, where unfilled slots get « báq raı ».
+- I never underfill full complementizer phrases, but I consider unfilled slots in determiner phrases to be filled according to the head determiner. In particular, indefinite DPs are existentially quantified in unfilled slots, while definite determiners have « ráı » in unfilled slots. For example, « tú fu » = « tú fu sâ raı » and « hú aıse » = « hú aıse lô raı ». The only deviation from this is in « báq » phrases, where unfilled slots get « báq raı ».
 
 - I frequently use overt adjunct heads, especially « [ı̂uq](https://toadua.uakci.space/##iGVz0emo4) », « [nûao](https://toadua.uakci.space/##cqtdPusTB) », « [ı̂aı](https://toadua.uakci.space/##ZxxlL0NdG) », « [ôq](https://toadua.uakci.space/##70rCWf6zQ#70rCWf6zQ) », and « [lû](https://toadua.uakci.space/##_odzwFLN5) ».